In my last post we all learned where Dorothy, my Cessna T182T, has been spending the winter. Unfortunate circumstances for me (and Dorothy!), as I had planned on flying Dorothy in a training course to obtain my Certificated Flight Instructor – Instrument (CFI-I) designation while in So. Cal. for the winter. And, by doing that, I would also renew my CFI-A and Multi-engine Instructor (MEI) designations that I first obtained in 1976. When the family and I were living and working in the Middle East for a number of years, that flight instructor certificate expired and now has to be renewed. But as the saying goes – sometimes you can turn lemons into lemonade and here’s how.
I decided to go ahead and enroll in the training program even though I couldn’t do the training in my T182T. Pinnacle Aviation Academy at the McClellan-Palomar Airport (KCRQ) here in Carlsbad, CA has a Cessna 172S on its flight line which incorporates the Garmin G1000 FMS – similar to Dorothy’s. N497TC is also similar to the C172S I owned before upgrading to Dorothy, the Cessna T182T, in 2009. Flying the 172S is a little different as it’s 180 HP vs. 235 in the T182T, non-turboed, doesn’t have a constant speed prop and has the non-integrated KAP 140 autopilot instead of the GFC 700. But for flight training purposes, it’s perfect.
The decision to get started on the training was a good one. I’ve been fortunate to be training with the Chief Instructor, James Treiber at Pinnacle. James is an extremely knowledgeable instructor and a great pilot. The training regimen includes learning how to create lesson plans for an instrument rating student and then teaching ground school to that lesson plan. I then take those lesson plans into the airplane for actual or simulated flight instruction. At the end of my training, I’ll have developed an instrument rating course syllabus that I can use when instructing instrument students and also for instrument proficiency checks (IPC). IPC’s are given to instrument rated pilots whose instrument currency has lapsed and can be given by an FAA Designate Flight Examiner, an FAA Inspector or an instrument instructor.
Concurrently with both the ground and flight training, I’m studying for the required FAA written exam. The study for that exam consists of aviation subjects related to navigation, instrument approach procedures, IFR en route procedures, aviation charts, understanding the flight instruments and the various systems that operate those instruments, flight planning, FAA Regulations for IFR flight, weather, being aware of physiological issues that can affect a pilot when in IMC conditions such as spatial disorientation, vertigo, etc.
As I write this post, I’ve completed Stage I of the training and will be starting Stage II on Tuesday. Stage I begins with the transition from flying from the left seat to the right seat, then practice on Basic Attitude Instrument Flying (BAIF) in simulated and actual IFR conditions, partial panel work in the event of loss of some flight instruments and consistently tightening the allowable deviations from altitude, heading and airspeed. Even though I’ve been instrument current, practicing BAIF was initially humbling and difficult, but with practice those basic flying skills return and the flying meets the FAA Instrument Pilot Practical Test Standards (PTS). Those standards are what I’ll have to fly to when taking my practical flight test at the end of this training and also, as an instructor, to what standards I’ll teach new instrument students.
Once the BAIF meets the PTS, Stage I moves to Instrument Navigation. Flying Dorothy with the G1000, I spend little time using Very High Frequency Omni-Directional Radio (VOR) navigation. I mostly navigate using the Global Positioning System (GPS). But, as an instrument instructor, you must fully understand, be able to fly and teach VOR. So, more BAIF, but at the same time incorporating identifying, intercepting and tracking VOR radials, locating your position using VOR radials, holding patterns using VOR’s, DME arcs using VOR’s and VOR instrument approach procedures (IAP).
Although Automatic Direction Finding (ADF) is still a task within the FAA’s PTS for instrument training, the Cessna 172S that I’m flying doesn’t have an ADF receiver to track Non-Directional Radio Beacons (NDB), so that particular navigation technique isn’t required as a part of my curriculum. ADF is quickly disappearing as a means of aviation navigation anyway.
Once VOR navigation is to PTS standards, Stage I Instrument Navigation, moves to the system that is quickly replacing all other aviation navigation – GPS. So, lesson plans are developed to teach how GPS operates and then flights in simulated or actual IFR conditions using GPS navigation to include direct to, flight planning, holding using GPS, DME arcs using GPS and an introduction to instrument approach procedures using GPS.
Copying, understanding and complying with Air Traffic Control (ATC) clearances is also introduced during Stage I.
As I wrote above, I’ve completed Stage I and in Stage II will begin preparing lesson plans for teaching instrument departures, instrument en route procedures, instrument arrivals and approaches and more involved ATC clearances. I’m looking forward to beginning this stage next week as Stage II is practicing and teaching the fun part of instrument flying.
In closing, the image at the beginning of the post is the Frasca Mentor G1000 flight simulator that is used at Pinnacle. All pilots and instructors know that the worst classroom in which to teach flight instruction is in the cockpit of an airplane. Use of the sim for practicing procedures, button pushology, etc. is invaluable. Another nice attribute of this sim is that with the instructor present and monitoring your simulated flight the time can be logged for instrument currency. The availability of this sim at Pinnacle Aviation Academy is invaluable for my training and I’m fortunate to have it available.